NEBOSH Diploma · CertIOSH · 35 Years UK Construction

Mechanical & Electrical Installation Method Statements & Risk Assessments

M&E subcontractors submit more RAMS than almost anyone else on a project, and they are frequently produced under time pressure by people who are excellent installers but have never sat on the reviewing side. The recurring rejection is safe isolation described in general terms rather than as a specific, auditable procedure with named competent persons.

24–48hr turnaround
18-point compliance standard
Resubmission included

Activities covered

Each document is written for the specific activity, site and programme — not adapted from a template for the trade.

Containment, tray and basket installation
Cable pulling, termination and testing
Distribution board and switchgear installation
Plant room mechanical installation
Ductwork and pipework installation
Sprinkler and wet riser installation
Commissioning, energisation and pressure testing
Rooftop and external plant installation

Hazards the assessment must address

  • Contact with live conductors and stored energy
  • Arc flash and burns during switching
  • Inadvertent re-energisation during works
  • Work at height on containment and plant runs
  • Manual handling of cable drums, plant and ductwork
  • Hot works during brazing, welding and soldering
  • Confined spaces in plant rooms, risers and voids
  • Pressure release during testing and commissioning
  • Legionella risk during water system commissioning

Regulations that apply

Electricity at Work Regulations 1989Regulations 12 to 14 — isolation, work on or near live conductors, and competence.
HSG85Electricity at work: safe working practices — the benchmark for safe isolation procedure.
BS 7671Wiring regulations — installation, inspection and testing requirements.
CDM 2015Contractor planning duties and interface with other trades in shared spaces.
Confined Spaces Regulations 1997Risers, ducts, plant rooms and voids where a specified risk exists.
Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000Pressure testing and commissioning of systems.

Why m&e installation RAMS get rejected

These are the findings that come up repeatedly on the reviewing side for this trade. If your document has been returned, the reason is very likely in this list.

Safe isolation described generically with no reference to HSG85 and no lock-off / tag-out detail
No named competent and authorised persons for isolation and switching
Proving dead and the use of an approved voltage indicator not described
Permit-to-work interface with the principal contractor not established
Work at height on containment runs not covered because the document focuses on the electrical risk
Hot works included in the method with no permit or fire watch arrangement
Riser and void access not recognised as potential confined space
Testing and commissioning phases absent — the RAMS stops at installation

Already been rejected? Send the document and the reviewer's comments. We diagnose exactly why it failed, rewrite it against your site information, and support the resubmission until it is accepted — at no extra charge.

The lifting element people miss

Rooftop plant, chillers, AHUs, transformers and packaged plant almost always arrive by crane. That lift needs planning under LOLER 1998 by a competent person, and a principal contractor will expect the lift plan and the M&E method statement to be consistent with each other.

See our mobile crane lift plans

Get a quote for m&e installation RAMS

07803 808093

3 fields, 30 seconds. We reply within 4 working hours.

Your details stay private. We never share enquiries with third parties.

Other trades we write for

Method statements and risk assessments across the full range of construction activities.

Need m&e installation RAMS that get accepted?

Fixed price, quoted the same day, written to the standard principal contractors review against.

WhatsAppCall Now